Conversation
|
|
pbrubeck
reviewed
Feb 15, 2025
pbrubeck
reviewed
Feb 17, 2025
dham
reviewed
Feb 17, 2025
pbrubeck
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
Ig-dolci
commented
Feb 20, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@pbrubeck @dham Firedrake pip installs PR depends on the approval of UFL PR 348 and this PR. |
Contributor
Author
|
The failure in the docs building is because of a recent Sphinx update. |
Ig-dolci
commented
Feb 21, 2025
connorjward
reviewed
Feb 21, 2025
pbrubeck
reviewed
Feb 21, 2025
pbrubeck
reviewed
Feb 21, 2025
connorjward
previously approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
Contributor
connorjward
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pbrubeck if you are also happy it would be fantastic if this could be merged ASAP as it is holding up the pip PR. Naturally we need to update our UFL fork at the same time.
pbrubeck
reviewed
Feb 25, 2025
pbrubeck
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Depends on firedrakeproject/ufl#60
Fixed an issue in
firedrake.ml.jax.ml_operatorwhereargument_slotswas incorrectly specified. I wrote it as optional:Clarified that if
argument_slotsis not provided,ML_Operatorwill automatically write it.Test the results involving the Neural operators are in right function space.
Test jax and pytorch operators in Firedrake CI.